<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Passing Curiosity: Posts tagged LaTeX</title>
    <link href="https://passingcuriosity.com/tags/latex/latex.xml" rel="self" />
    <link href="https://passingcuriosity.com" />
    <id>https://passingcuriosity.com/tags/latex/latex.xml</id>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Sutton</name>
        
        <email>me@thomas-sutton.id.au</email>
        
    </author>
    <updated>2006-05-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <entry>
    <title>Wanted: LaTeX packages</title>
    <link href="https://passingcuriosity.com/2006/wanted-latex-packages/" />
    <id>https://passingcuriosity.com/2006/wanted-latex-packages/</id>
    <published>2006-05-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I’ve got a hankering to dig out my incomplete thesis and polish it off as an
excuse to <em>really</em> get up to speed with <a href="http://www.tug.org/">LaTeX</a>. As such,
I’m looking for LaTeX packages that accomplish a number of tasks:</p>
<ul>
<li><p><em>Unicode and symbols</em></p>
<p>The main thing I’m after is a package that will allow me to <code>&amp;and;</code> instead
of <code>\wedge</code> in my LaTeX source and have it Just Work (TM). A single package
that provides consistent symbol handling would be nice too.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Meta-data support</em></p>
<pre><code>While [hyperref][] can be used to add PDF meta-data, and [xmpincl][] can
include an RDF license when using `pdftex`, you still need to do it all
yourself. It'd be nice if there was a module that would do it for you.</code></pre></li>
<li><p><em>Font handling</em></p>
<p>A single, consistent way to handle real fonts. I like <em>Computer Modern</em> as
much as the next person, but once in a while I’d like to be able to use
another font without having to wrestle with TeX.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>I’ll admit that most of my desire for packages to address these issues is
probably an issue more of my knowledge of existing code than that code’s
availability, but it’d be nice if there was a little more consistency in my
LaTeX environment and a <em>lot</em> more consistency in Google’s LaTeX search
results.</p>]]></summary>
</entry>

</feed>
