<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Passing Curiosity: Posts tagged costs</title>
    <link href="https://passingcuriosity.com/tags/costs/costs.xml" rel="self" />
    <link href="https://passingcuriosity.com" />
    <id>https://passingcuriosity.com/tags/costs/costs.xml</id>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Sutton</name>
        
        <email>me@thomas-sutton.id.au</email>
        
    </author>
    <updated>2005-05-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <entry>
    <title>The Cost of Dead Trees</title>
    <link href="https://passingcuriosity.com/2005/the-cost-of-dead-trees/" />
    <id>https://passingcuriosity.com/2005/the-cost-of-dead-trees/</id>
    <published>2005-05-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2005-05-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I’ve just been reading a bit of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0262220695/">Concepts, Techniques and Models of Computer
Programming by Van Roy and Haridi</a> (aka CTM). As I often do, I’ve used the
receipt as a book mark (primarily because the bookshop staff put the receipt in
the book when I ask them not to put my purchases in a bag).</p>
<p>CTM cost me, after the Co-op members discount, $97. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0521826144/">Haskell 98 Language and
Libraries: the Revised Report</a> cost me $108. I’m sure there is some obtuse
economic explanation involving economies of scale and the like, but it seems
fairly counter intuitive that a book that is over 900 pages long is cheaper
than one with less than 300.</p>
<p>The cost of books in general, and academic texts in particular, is (in my
opinion) revolting.</p>]]></summary>
</entry>

</feed>
